Xiaomi Pad 11.2" 62779 Blu 2025

Xiaomi Pad 11.2" 62779 Blu 2025

Xiaomi
79 Puntuación general
vs
Hyperstrix AerPad 14" UNP100 2025

Hyperstrix AerPad 14" UNP100 2025

Hyperstrix
44 Puntuación general

Puntuaciones

Entertainment
Xiaomi
82
Hyperstrix
51
Art Design
Xiaomi
80
Hyperstrix
36
Reading
Xiaomi
79
Hyperstrix
56
Productivity
Xiaomi
71
Hyperstrix
40
Student
Xiaomi
69
Hyperstrix
55
Business
Xiaomi
62
Hyperstrix
45

Especificaciones

Xiaomi Pad 11.2" 62779Hyperstrix AerPad 14" UNP100
Processor
CPU3 GHzAMD Ryzen 3 1200★
CPU Multi-Core ScoreSin datos
6,266
Cores8★4
GPU—UHD Graphics★
GPU Benchmark ScoreSin datos
1,534
Memory & Storage
RAM12 GB16 GB★
RAM Generation—LPDDR5★
Storage512 GB512 GB
Storage Type—SSD★
Expandable✗—
Display
Size11.2"14"
Resolution3200 px★—
PanelLCDIPS★
Refresh Rate144 Hz★—
Brightness800 nits★—
Connectivity
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6E★Wi-Fi 6
BluetoothBluetooth 5.4★Bluetooth 5.2
USB-C12★
Cellular✗—
Features
Stylus Support✓★—
Fingerprint Reader✓★—
Physical
Weight0.45 kg★2.00 kg
Battery—38 Wh★
OSHyperOS 2Windows 11 Pro

Pros y Contras

Xiaomi Pad 11.2" 62779 Blu 2025

  • Strong screen (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong cpu (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong gpu (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong storage (89th percentile)89th %ile

Hyperstrix AerPad 14" UNP100 2025

  • Strong battery (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong ram (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong storage (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong connectivity (80th percentile)80th %ile
  • Below average cpu (10th percentile)10th %ile
  • Below average gpu (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average user sentiment (21st percentile)
  • Below average feature (30th percentile)

Veredicto

★ Ganador: Xiaomi Pad 11.2" 62779

Scores 79 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 9 of 24 specs.

Xiaomi Pad 11.2" 62779 Mejor en:

ReadingStudentBusinessArt DesignProductivityEntertainment