ASUS ROG Strix XG27UCDMG 26.5" Black 2025
ASUS
100 Puntuación general
vs
CAPERAVE CF17H 17.3"
CAPERAVE
62 Puntuación general
Puntuaciones
Portable
Office
Gaming
Professional
Creative
Entertainment
Especificaciones
| ASUS ROG Strix XG27UCDMG 26.5" | CAPERAVE CF17H 17.3" | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | ||
| Size | 27" | 17.3" |
| Resolution | 3840 x 2160 | 1920 x 1080 |
| Panel Type | OLED★ | IPS |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Curved | ✗ | ✗ |
| Performance | ||
| Refresh Rate | 240 Hz★ | 144 Hz |
| Response Time | 0.029999999329447746 ms★ | — |
| Adaptive Sync | FreeSync Premium Pro★ | — |
| Color & HDR | ||
| Brightness | 450 nits★ | — |
| Color Gamut | 99% DCI-P3, 145% sRGB | 100% sRGB |
| Color Depth | 10-bit★ | — |
| HDR | DisplayHDR True Black 400 | HDR |
| HDR Support | HDR400 | HDR |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI Ports | 2★ | 1 |
| DisplayPort | 1★ | — |
| USB-C | 1 | 2★ |
| Thunderbolt | — | Thunderbolt 3.0 |
| Speakers | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Headphone Jack | ✓★ | — |
| Ergonomics | ||
| Height Adjustable | ✓★ | — |
| Tilt | ✓ | ✓ |
| Swivel | ✓★ | — |
| Pivot | ✓★ | — |
| VESA Mount | 100x100 | — |
| Features | ||
| Webcam | ✗ | — |
| Touchscreen | ✗ | — |
| PIP/PBP | ✓★ | — |
| Power | 80W★ | — |
| Weight | 7.44 kg | 1.00 kg★ |
Pros y Contras
ASUS ROG Strix XG27UCDMG 26.5" Black 2025
- Strong social proof (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong performance (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong display (98th percentile)98th %ile
CAPERAVE CF17H 17.3"
- Strong portability (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong connectivity (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong social proof (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Below average display (22nd percentile)
Precios
ASUS ROG Strix XG27UCDMG 26.5" Black 20250.006puntos por dólar
vs
CAPERAVE CF17H 17.3"0.019puntos por dólar
CAPERAVE CF17H 17.3" ofrece 3.2x mejor relación calidad-precio
ASUS ROG Strix XG27UCDMG 26.5" Black 2025
CAPERAVE CF17H 17.3"
Veredicto
Ganador: ASUS ROG Strix XG27UCDMG 26.5"
Scores 100 overall, wins 5 of 6 usage categories and 14 of 29 specs.
