Dell S2725QC 27" Ash White 2026
Dell
87 Puntuación general
vs
Samsung Odyssey G6 32" Black 2025
Samsung
58 Puntuación general
Puntuaciones
Office
Professional
Creative
Gaming
Entertainment
Portable
Especificaciones
| Dell S2725QC 27" | Samsung Odyssey G6 32" | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | ||
| Size | 27" | 32" |
| Resolution | 3840 x 2160 | 2560 x 1440 |
| Panel Type | IPS★ | VA |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Curved | ✗ | ✓ |
| Curvature | — | 1,000 |
| Performance | ||
| Refresh Rate | 120 Hz | 240 Hz★ |
| Response Time | 8 ms | 1 ms★ |
| Adaptive Sync | FreeSync Premium | FreeSync Premium Pro★ |
| Color & HDR | ||
| Brightness | 350 nits | 600 nits★ |
| Color Gamut | 99% sRGB | — |
| HDR | HDR | DisplayHDR 600 |
| HDR Support | HDR | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI Ports | 2★ | — |
| DisplayPort | 1★ | — |
| USB-C | 1★ | — |
| Speakers | ✓★ | — |
| Headphone Jack | ✗ | — |
| Ergonomics | ||
| Height Adjustable | ✓★ | — |
| Tilt | ✓ | ✓ |
| Swivel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pivot | ✓★ | — |
| VESA Mount | 100x100 | — |
| Features | ||
| Webcam | ✗ | — |
| Touchscreen | ✗ | ✗ |
| PIP/PBP | ✗ | — |
| Power | 25W★ | — |
| Weight | 6.71 kg★ | 10.89 kg |
Pros y Contras
Dell S2725QC 27" Ash White 2026
- Strong user sentiment (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong social proof (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong ergonomic (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong display (90th percentile)90th %ile
Samsung Odyssey G6 32" Black 2025
- Strong color (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong feature (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong performance (89th percentile)89th %ile
- Strong display (77th percentile)
- Below average portability (4th percentile)4th %ile
- Below average connectivity (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average social proof (25th percentile)
Precios
Dell S2725QC 27" Ash White 20260.010puntos por dólar
vs
Samsung Odyssey G6 32" Black 20250.003puntos por dólar
Dell S2725QC 27" Ash White 2026 ofrece 3.3x mejor relación calidad-precio
Dell S2725QC 27" Ash White 2026
Samsung Odyssey G6 32" Black 2025
Veredicto
Ganador: Dell S2725QC 27"
Scores 87 overall, wins 4 of 6 usage categories and 9 of 28 specs.
