Rokinon Cine 24MM T/1.5 24mm
Rokinon
35 Puntuación general
vs
Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR 140mm
Fujifilm
74 Puntuación general
Puntuaciones
Wildlife Sports
Video Cinema
Landscape
Professional
Budget
Travel
Portrait
Street
Macro
Especificaciones
| Rokinon Cine 24MM T/1.5 24mm | Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR 140mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | zoom | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 24 mm | 50 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 24 mm | 140 mm |
| Elements | 16 | 23 |
| Groups | 11 | 16 |
| Aspherical Elements | 2★ | — |
| ED Elements | 2 | 6★ |
| Coating | UMC | Nano-GI (Gradient Index) coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/3.5 | f/22 |
| Min Aperture | f/3.5 | f/2.8 |
| Constant | ✓ | ✓ |
| Diaphragm Blades | — | 7★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Sony E | Fujifilm X |
| Format | full-frame★ | APS-C |
| Weather Sealed | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | 0.73 kg★ | 0.99 kg |
| Filter Thread | 82 mm | 72 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | manual focus only | Triple Linear Motor★ |
| Stabilization | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Stabilization Stops | — | 5 stops★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | — | 1.00 m★ |
| Max Magnification | — | 0.12x★ |
Pros y Contras
Rokinon Cine 24MM T/1.5 24mm
- Strong optical (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong aperture (78th percentile)
- Strong bokeh (76th percentile)
- Below average user sentiment (11th percentile)11th %ile
- Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
- Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average social proof (21st percentile)
Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR 140mm
- Strong optical (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong stabilization (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (81st percentile)81st %ile
- Below average bokeh (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average aperture (21st percentile)
- Below average macro (28th percentile)
Precios
Rokinon Cine 24MM T/1.5 24mm
Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR 140mm
No current pricing available
Veredicto
Ganador: Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR 140mm
Scores 74 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 22 specs.
