Zeiss Batis 000000-2136-695 135mm
Zeiss
72 Puntuación general
vs
Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm
Panasonic
88 Puntuación general
Puntuaciones
Macro
Travel
Landscape
Budget
Video Cinema
Professional
Portrait
Street
Wildlife Sports
Especificaciones
| Zeiss Batis 000000-2136-695 135mm | Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | telephoto | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 135 mm | 28 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 135 mm | 200 mm |
| Elements | 14 | 17 |
| Groups | 11 | 13 |
| Aspherical Elements | — | 1★ |
| ED Elements | — | 4★ |
| Coating | ZEISS T* coating | Fluorine coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/2.8 | f/4 |
| Min Aperture | f/2.8 | 4-7.1 |
| Constant | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Diaphragm Blades | — | 9★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Sony E | L-Mount |
| Format | full-frame | full-frame |
| Weather Sealed | ✓ | ✓ |
| Weight | 0.61 kg | 0.41 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | 67 mm | 67 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Autofocus | Autofocus |
| Stabilization | ✓ | ✓ |
| Stabilization Stops | — | 6.5 stops★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | — | 140 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | — | 0.5x★ |
Pros y Contras
Zeiss Batis 000000-2136-695 135mm
- Strong social proof (85th percentile)85th %ile
- Strong aperture (85th percentile)85th %ile
- Strong stabilization (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Strong bokeh (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
- Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average versatility (33rd percentile)
Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm
- Strong stabilization (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong versatility (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong optical (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong bokeh (78th percentile)
- Below average user sentiment (22nd percentile)
Precios
Zeiss Batis 000000-2136-695 135mm0.003puntos por dólar
vs
Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm0.004puntos por dólar
Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm ofrece 1.3x mejor relación calidad-precio
Zeiss Batis 000000-2136-695 135mm
Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm
Veredicto
Ganador: Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm
Scores 88 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 22 specs.
