Canon RF 24-240mm f/4-6.3 IS USM

Canon RF 24-240mm f/4-6.3 IS USM

Canon
74 Puntuación general
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
95 Puntuación general

Puntuaciones

Professional
Canon
57
Nikon
95
Portrait
Canon
48
Nikon
89
Street
Canon
60
Nikon
86
Budget
Canon
81
Nikon
86
Macro
Canon
57
Nikon
85
Landscape
Canon
71
Nikon
83
Video Cinema
Canon
62
Nikon
83
Wildlife Sports
Canon
67
Nikon
78
Travel
Canon
66
Nikon
75

Especificaciones

Canon RF 24-240mm f/4-6.3 IS USMNikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min24 mm17 mm
Focal Length Max240 mm28 mm
Elements2113
Groups1511
Aspherical Elements3
ED Elements3
CoatingMulti-Coated
Aperture
Max Aperture22-36f/2.8
Min Aperture4-6.3f/2.8
Constant
Diaphragm Blades79
Build
MountCanon RFNikon Z
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight0.75 kg0.45 kg
Filter Thread72 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeNano USMStepping Motor
Stabilization
Stabilization Stops5 stops
Focus
Min Focus Distance500 mm190 mm
Max Magnification0.26x1:5.26

Pros y Contras

Canon RF 24-240mm f/4-6.3 IS USM

  • Strong versatility (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong af (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong social proof (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Below average bokeh (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average aperture (21st percentile)

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile

Precios

Both products are similarly priced.

Canon RF 24-240mm f/4-6.3 IS USM0.003puntos por dólar
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.80.004puntos por dólar

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 ofrece 1.3x mejor relación calidad-precio

Canon RF 24-240mm f/4-6.3 IS USM

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Veredicto

Ganador: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 95 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 22 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Mejor en:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

También considerar