Panasonic LUMIX S S-E100 100mm
Panasonic
88 Puntuación general
vs
Sigma DG Contemporary 24mm f/3.5 DG 24mm
Sigma
72 Puntuación general
Puntuaciones
Street
Macro
Professional
Portrait
Video Cinema
Budget
Wildlife Sports
Travel
Landscape
Especificaciones
| Panasonic LUMIX S S-E100 100mm | Sigma DG Contemporary 24mm f/3.5 DG 24mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | macro | prime |
| Focal Length Min | 100 mm | 24 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 100 mm | 24 mm |
| Elements | 13 | 10 |
| Groups | 11 | 8 |
| Aspherical Elements | 3 | 3 |
| ED Elements | 3★ | 1 |
| Coating | — | Super Multi-Layer Coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/2.8 | f/3.5 |
| Min Aperture | f/2.8 | f/3.5 |
| Constant | ✓ | ✓ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 9★ | 7 |
| Build | ||
| Mount | L-Mount | L-Mount |
| Format | full-frame | full-frame |
| Weather Sealed | ✓ | ✓ |
| Weight | 0.30 kg★ | 0.44 kg |
| Filter Thread | 67 mm | 55 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Dual phase linear motor★ | stepping motor |
| Stabilization | ✗ | ✗ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 204 mm | 100 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | 1:1 | 1:2 |
Pros y Contras
Panasonic LUMIX S S-E100 100mm
- Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong build (86th percentile)86th %ile
- Strong aperture (84th percentile)84th %ile
- Below average versatility (34th percentile)
Sigma DG Contemporary 24mm f/3.5 DG 24mm
- Strong macro (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong aperture (77th percentile)
- Strong build (76th percentile)
- Below average social proof (30th percentile)
- Below average versatility (34th percentile)
Precios
Panasonic LUMIX S S-E100 100mm0.003puntos por dólar
vs
Sigma DG Contemporary 24mm f/3.5 DG 24mm0.004puntos por dólar
Sigma DG Contemporary 24mm f/3.5 DG 24mm ofrece 1.3x mejor relación calidad-precio
Panasonic LUMIX S S-E100 100mm
Sigma DG Contemporary 24mm f/3.5 DG 24mm
Veredicto
Ganador: Panasonic LUMIX S S-E100 100mm
Scores 88 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 4 of 21 specs.
