Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

Sigma
91 Puntuación general
vs
Nikon NIKKOR AF-S DX 16-85mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR

Nikon NIKKOR AF-S DX 16-85mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR

Nikon
37 Puntuación general

Puntuaciones

Professional
Sigma
98
Nikon
40
Portrait
Sigma
90
Nikon
56
Street
Sigma
88
Nikon
43
Budget
Sigma
85
Nikon
46
Video Cinema
Sigma
85
Nikon
44
Macro
Sigma
83
Nikon
14
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
80
Nikon
36
Landscape
Sigma
77
Nikon
28
Travel
Sigma
75
Nikon
34

Especificaciones

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mmNikon NIKKOR AF-S DX 16-85mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR
Optics
Typezoom
Focal Length Min16 mm16 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm85 mm
Elements16
Groups11
Aspherical Elements4
ED Elements5
CoatingSuper Multi-Layer Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/3.5
Min Aperturef/2.8
Constant
Diaphragm Blades9
Build
MountSony E
Formatfull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight0.45 kg
Filter Thread72 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping AF Motor
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance250 mm
Max Magnification1:5.55

Pros y Contras

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

  • Strong optical (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong aperture (85th percentile)85th %ile

Nikon NIKKOR AF-S DX 16-85mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR

  • Strong versatility (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong aperture (78th percentile)
  • Strong bokeh (76th percentile)
  • Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average optical (21st percentile)
  • Below average social proof (21st percentile)
  • Below average build (34th percentile)

Veredicto

Ganador: Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 21 specs.

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm Mejor en:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports