Canon RF 24-105mm f/2.8 L IS USM Z
Canon
78 総合スコア
vs
Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR 140mm
Fujifilm
74 総合スコア
スコア
Wildlife Sports
Video Cinema
Landscape
Budget
Professional
Travel
Macro
Street
Portrait
スペック
| Canon RF 24-105mm f/2.8 L IS USM Z | Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR 140mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | zoom | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 24 mm | 50 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 105 mm | 140 mm |
| Elements | 23 | 23 |
| Groups | 18 | 16 |
| Aspherical Elements | 3★ | — |
| ED Elements | 4 | 6★ |
| Coating | Fluorine coating | Nano-GI (Gradient Index) coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/22 | f/22 |
| Min Aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.8 |
| Constant | ✓ | ✓ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 11★ | 7 |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Canon RF | Fujifilm X |
| Format | full-frame★ | APS-C |
| Weather Sealed | ✓ | ✓ |
| Weight | 1.31 kg | 0.99 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | 82 mm | 72 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Nano USM | Triple Linear Motor★ |
| Stabilization | ✓ | ✓ |
| Stabilization Stops | 5.5 stops★ | 5 stops |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 450 mm★ | 1.00 m |
| Max Magnification | 0.29x★ | 0.12x |
長所と短所
Canon RF 24-105mm f/2.8 L IS USM Z
- Strong optical (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong stabilization (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong af (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong social proof (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Below average aperture (21st percentile)
- Below average build (24th percentile)
- Below average bokeh (35th percentile)
Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR 140mm
- Strong optical (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong stabilization (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (81st percentile)81st %ile
- Below average bokeh (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average aperture (21st percentile)
- Below average macro (28th percentile)
結論
勝者: Canon RF 24-105mm f/2.8 L IS USM Z
Scores 78 overall, wins 3 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 22 specs.