Nikon NIKKOR AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm f/4G ED VR

Nikon NIKKOR AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm f/4G ED VR

Nikon
80 総合スコア
vs
Ricoh D FA 28-105MM F3.5-5.6ED DC WR

Ricoh D FA 28-105MM F3.5-5.6ED DC WR

Ricoh
48 総合スコア

スコア

Macro
Nikon
79
Ricoh
18
Budget
Nikon
78
Ricoh
60
Portrait
Nikon
78
Ricoh
55
Video Cinema
Nikon
76
Ricoh
41
Professional
Nikon
74
Ricoh
35
Street
Nikon
69
Ricoh
49
Landscape
Nikon
66
Ricoh
34
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
59
Ricoh
38
Travel
Nikon
58
Ricoh
44

スペック

Nikon NIKKOR AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm f/4G ED VRRicoh D FA 28-105MM F3.5-5.6ED DC WR
Optics
Typezoom
Focal Length Min16 mm28 mm
Focal Length Max35 mm105 mm
Elements17
Groups12
Aspherical Elements3
ED Elements2
CoatingNano Crystal Coat
Aperture
Max Aperturef/4
Min Aperturef/43.5-5.6
Constant
Diaphragm Blades9
Build
MountNikon F
Formatfull-frame
Weight0.68 kg0.50 kg
Filter Thread77 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeSilent Wave Motor
Stabilization
Stabilization Stops2.5 stops
Focus
Min Focus Distance290 mm
Max Magnification1:4

長所と短所

Nikon NIKKOR AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm f/4G ED VR

  • Strong optical (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong bokeh (79th percentile)
  • Strong stabilization (76th percentile)
  • Strong versatility (75th percentile)

Ricoh D FA 28-105MM F3.5-5.6ED DC WR

  • Strong versatility (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Strong aperture (67th percentile)
  • Strong bokeh (66th percentile)
  • Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average optical (21st percentile)

価格

Nikon NIKKOR AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm f/4G ED VR is ¥15,604 cheaper (1.2x less).

Nikon NIKKOR AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm f/4G ED VR

Ricoh D FA 28-105MM F3.5-5.6ED DC WR

結論

勝者: Nikon NIKKOR AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm f/4G ED VR

Scores 80 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 9 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm f/4G ED VR 優れている点:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

こちらもおすすめ