Tamron Di III A046 17-28mm

Tamron Di III A046 17-28mm

Tamron
82 総合スコア
vs
Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR 140mm

Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR 140mm

Fujifilm
74 総合スコア

スコア

Wildlife Sports
Tamron
69
Fujifilm
87
Video Cinema
Tamron
76
Fujifilm
81
Landscape
Tamron
64
Fujifilm
81
Portrait
Tamron
79
Fujifilm
51
Professional
Tamron
79
Fujifilm
79
Budget
Tamron
78
Fujifilm
75
Street
Tamron
72
Fujifilm
63
Travel
Tamron
70
Fujifilm
71
Macro
Tamron
57
Fujifilm
58

スペック

Tamron Di III A046 17-28mmFujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR 140mm
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min17 mm50 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm140 mm
Elements23
Groups16
ED Elements6
Coatingfluorine coatingNano-GI (Gradient Index) coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/22
Min Aperturef/2.8f/2.8
Constant
Diaphragm Blades97
Build
MountSony EFujifilm X
Formatfull-frameAPS-C
Weather Sealed
Weight0.42 kg0.99 kg
Filter Thread67 mm72 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeRXDTriple Linear Motor
Stabilization
Stabilization Stops5 stops
Focus
Min Focus Distance190 mm1.00 m
Max Magnification0.19-0.17x0.12x

長所と短所

Tamron Di III A046 17-28mm

  • Strong social proof (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong aperture (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (83rd percentile)83rd %ile

Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR 140mm

  • Strong optical (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (81st percentile)81st %ile
  • Below average bokeh (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average aperture (21st percentile)
  • Below average macro (28th percentile)

結論

勝者: Tamron Di III A046 17-28mm

Scores 82 overall, wins 3 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 21 specs.

Tamron Di III A046 17-28mm 優れている点:

BudgetStreetPortrait

Fujifilm XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR 140mm 優れている点:

LandscapeVideo CinemaWildlife Sports