BENOISON 420-Nikon--F 420-800mm
BENOISON
39 Overall Score
vs
Fujifilm XF 35mm f/2 R WR 35mm
Fujifilm
67 Overall Score
Scores
Street
Professional
Travel
Budget
Wildlife Sports
Video Cinema
Landscape
Portrait
Macro
Specifications
| BENOISON 420-Nikon--F 420-800mm | Fujifilm XF 35mm f/2 R WR 35mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | telephoto | prime |
| Focal Length Min | 420 mm | 35 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 800 mm | 35 mm |
| Elements | — | 9 |
| Groups | — | 6 |
| Aspherical Elements | — | 2★ |
| ED Elements | — | 2★ |
| Coating | — | Nano-GI coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/16 | f/16 |
| Min Aperture | 8.3-16 | f/2 |
| Constant | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Diaphragm Blades | — | 9★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Nikon F | Fujifilm X |
| Format | full-frame★ | APS-C |
| Weather Sealed | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | 0.72 kg | 0.17 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | 62 mm | 43 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | manual focus only | stepping motor★ |
| Stabilization | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 800 mm | 350 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | — | 0.135x★ |
Pros & Cons
BENOISON 420-Nikon--F 420-800mm
- Strong stabilization (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Strong versatility (69th percentile)
- Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
- Below average user sentiment (16th percentile)16th %ile
- Below average optical (21st percentile)
- Below average bokeh (30th percentile)
Fujifilm XF 35mm f/2 R WR 35mm
- Strong build (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong social proof (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong optical (67th percentile)
- Below average versatility (33rd percentile)
- Below average macro (34th percentile)
Pricing
BENOISON 420-Nikon--F 420-800mm0.546score per dollar
vs
Fujifilm XF 35mm f/2 R WR 35mm0.191score per dollar
BENOISON 420-Nikon--F 420-800mm offers 2.9x better value for money
BENOISON 420-Nikon--F 420-800mm
Fujifilm XF 35mm f/2 R WR 35mm
Verdict
Winner: Fujifilm XF 35mm f/2 R WR 35mm
Scores 67 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 9 of 21 specs.
