Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD
Tamron
100 Overall Score
vs
Zeiss Biogon T* ZM 1365-652-L 25mm
Zeiss
52 Overall Score
Scores
Video Cinema
Professional
Budget
Travel
Macro
Portrait
Landscape
Street
Wildlife Sports
Specifications
| Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD | Zeiss Biogon T* ZM 1365-652-L 25mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | zoom | wide-angle |
| Focal Length Min | 17 mm | 25 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 70 mm | 25 mm |
| Elements | 16 | 9 |
| Groups | 12 | 7 |
| Aspherical Elements | 3★ | — |
| ED Elements | 2★ | — |
| Coating | Fluorine Coating | T* coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.8 |
| Min Aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.8 |
| Constant | ✓ | ✓ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 9 | 10★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Fujifilm X | Leica M |
| Format | APS-C | full-frame★ |
| Weather Sealed | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Weight | 0.54 kg | 0.26 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | 67 mm | 46 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | RXD | manual focus only |
| Stabilization | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 190 mm★ | 500 mm |
| Max Magnification | 1:4.8★ | 0.05625 |
Pros & Cons
Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD
- Strong optical (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong versatility (89th percentile)89th %ile
- Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong macro (86th percentile)86th %ile
Zeiss Biogon T* ZM 1365-652-L 25mm
- Strong bokeh (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong aperture (85th percentile)85th %ile
- Strong build (80th percentile)80th %ile
- Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
- Below average macro (28th percentile)
- Below average versatility (33rd percentile)
Pricing
Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD0.161score per dollar
vs
Zeiss Biogon T* ZM 1365-652-L 25mm0.042score per dollar
Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD offers 3.8x better value for money
Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD
Zeiss Biogon T* ZM 1365-652-L 25mm
Verdict
Winner: Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD
Scores 100 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 21 specs.
