Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Sigma
44 Overall Score
vs
Rokinon AF IO3518-E 35mm

Rokinon AF IO3518-E 35mm

Rokinon
50 Overall Score

Scores

Street
Sigma
46
Rokinon
62
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
39
Rokinon
60
Portrait
Sigma
59
Rokinon
42
Landscape
Sigma
33
Rokinon
58
Travel
Sigma
40
Rokinon
57
Professional
Sigma
42
Rokinon
57
Budget
Sigma
56
Rokinon
47
Video Cinema
Sigma
47
Rokinon
46
Macro
Sigma
16
Rokinon
46

Specifications

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OSRokinon AF IO3518-E 35mm
Optics
Typeprime
Focal Length Min16 mm35 mm
Focal Length Max300 mm35 mm
Elements10
Groups8
Aspherical Elements2
ED Elements2
CoatingUltra Multi-Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/3.5f/22
Min Aperturef/1.8
Constant
Diaphragm Blades9
Build
MountSony E
Formatfull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight0.21 kg
Filter Thread58 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF Typelinear STM
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance290 mm
Max Magnification0.17x

Pros & Cons

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

  • Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong aperture (78th percentile)
  • Strong bokeh (76th percentile)
  • Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average optical (21st percentile)
  • Below average social proof (29th percentile)
  • Below average build (34th percentile)

Rokinon AF IO3518-E 35mm

  • Strong build (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong optical (71st percentile)
  • Below average aperture (21st percentile)
  • Below average bokeh (24th percentile)
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)

Verdict

Winner: Rokinon AF IO3518-E 35mm

Scores 50 overall, wins 6 of 9 usage categories and 9 of 21 specs.

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS Better at:

BudgetPortrait

Rokinon AF IO3518-E 35mm Better at:

MacroStreetTravelLandscapeProfessionalWildlife Sports