Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Sigma
44 Overall Score
vs
Sony FE SEL50F18F/2 50mm

Sony FE SEL50F18F/2 50mm

Sony
58 Overall Score

Scores

Travel
Sigma
40
Sony
67
Professional
Sigma
42
Sony
59
Portrait
Sigma
59
Sony
42
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
39
Sony
58
Landscape
Sigma
33
Sony
57
Street
Sigma
46
Sony
56
Video Cinema
Sigma
47
Sony
56
Budget
Sigma
56
Sony
56
Macro
Sigma
16
Sony
46

Specifications

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OSSony FE SEL50F18F/2 50mm
Optics
Typeprime
Focal Length Min16 mm50 mm
Focal Length Max300 mm50 mm
Elements9
Groups8
Aspherical Elements1
Aperture
Max Aperturef/3.5f/22
Min Aperturef/1.8
Constant
Diaphragm Blades7
Build
MountSony E
Formatfull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight0.20 kg
Filter Thread49 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAutofocus
Stabilization
Stabilization Stops4 stops
Focus
Min Focus Distance390 mm
Max Magnification0.16x

Pros & Cons

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

  • Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong aperture (78th percentile)
  • Strong bokeh (76th percentile)
  • Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average optical (21st percentile)
  • Below average social proof (29th percentile)
  • Below average build (34th percentile)

Sony FE SEL50F18F/2 50mm

  • Strong stabilization (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong build (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong social proof (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Below average bokeh (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average aperture (21st percentile)
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)

Pricing

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

No current pricing available

Sony FE SEL50F18F/2 50mm

Verdict

Winner: Sony FE SEL50F18F/2 50mm

Scores 58 overall, wins 7 of 9 usage categories and 9 of 20 specs.

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS Better at:

Portrait

Sony FE SEL50F18F/2 50mm Better at:

MacroStreetTravelLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider