Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
95 Overall Score
vs
Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III

Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III

Canon
49 Overall Score

Scores

Professional
Nikon
95
Canon
35
Portrait
Nikon
89
Canon
26
Street
Nikon
86
Canon
42
Budget
Nikon
86
Canon
60
Macro
Nikon
85
Canon
34
Landscape
Nikon
83
Canon
58
Video Cinema
Nikon
83
Canon
34
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
78
Canon
46
Travel
Nikon
75
Canon
62

Specifications

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min17 mm75 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm300 mm
Elements1313
Groups119
Aspherical Elements30
ED Elements3
CoatingMulti-CoatedSuper Spectra Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/75
Min Aperturef/2.84-5.6
Constant
Diaphragm Blades97
Build
MountNikon ZCanon EF
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight0.45 kg0.48 kg
Filter Thread67 mm58 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping MotorDC
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance190 mm1.50 m
Max Magnification1:5.260.25x

Pros & Cons

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile

Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III

  • Strong versatility (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong social proof (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Below average aperture (1st percentile)1st %ile
  • Below average bokeh (1st percentile)1st %ile
  • Below average macro (29th percentile)

Pricing

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III

No current pricing available

Verdict

Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 95 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 9 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider