Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Nikon
95 Overall Score
vs
Sigma Sports 70-200mm f/2.8 DG DN OS
Sigma
69 Overall Score
Scores
Professional
Portrait
Street
Budget
Macro
Landscape
Video Cinema
Wildlife Sports
Travel
Specifications
| Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 | Sigma Sports 70-200mm f/2.8 DG DN OS | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | zoom | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 17 mm | 70 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 28 mm | 200 mm |
| Elements | 13 | 20 |
| Groups | 11 | 15 |
| Aspherical Elements | 3 | 3 |
| ED Elements | 3 | 10★ |
| Coating | Multi-Coated | Super Multi-Layer Coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/2.8 | f/22 |
| Min Aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.8 |
| Constant | ✓ | ✓ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 9 | 11★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Nikon Z | Sony E |
| Format | full-frame | full-frame |
| Weather Sealed | ✓ | ✓ |
| Weight | 0.45 kg★ | 1.34 kg |
| Filter Thread | 67 mm | 77 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Stepping Motor★ | HSM |
| Stabilization | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Stabilization Stops | — | 7.5 stops★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 190 mm★ | 650 mm |
| Max Magnification | 1:5.26 | 1:5.2 |
Pros & Cons
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
- Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
Sigma Sports 70-200mm f/2.8 DG DN OS
- Strong optical (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong stabilization (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong versatility (79th percentile)
- Strong social proof (71st percentile)
- Below average aperture (21st percentile)
- Below average build (23rd percentile)
- Below average bokeh (35th percentile)
Pricing
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.80.102score per dollar
vs
Sigma Sports 70-200mm f/2.8 DG DN OS0.045score per dollar
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 offers 2.3x better value for money
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Sigma Sports 70-200mm f/2.8 DG DN OS
Verdict
Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Scores 95 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 3 of 22 specs.
