Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
95 Overall Score
vs
Fujifilm XF 16mm f/1.4 R WR 16mm

Fujifilm XF 16mm f/1.4 R WR 16mm

Fujifilm
69 Overall Score

Scores

Professional
Nikon
95
Fujifilm
70
Portrait
Nikon
89
Fujifilm
55
Street
Nikon
86
Fujifilm
61
Budget
Nikon
86
Fujifilm
61
Macro
Nikon
85
Fujifilm
59
Landscape
Nikon
83
Fujifilm
60
Video Cinema
Nikon
83
Fujifilm
58
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
78
Fujifilm
56
Travel
Nikon
75
Fujifilm
56

Specifications

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8Fujifilm XF 16mm f/1.4 R WR 16mm
Optics
Typezoomprime
Focal Length Min17 mm16 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm16 mm
Elements1313
Groups1111
Aspherical Elements32
ED Elements32
CoatingMulti-CoatedNano-GI and HT-EBC
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/16
Min Aperturef/2.8f/1.4
Constant
Diaphragm Blades99
Build
MountNikon ZFujifilm X
Formatfull-frameAPS-C
Weather Sealed
Weight0.45 kg0.38 kg
Filter Thread67 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping MotorAutofocus
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance190 mm150 mm
Max Magnification1:5.260.21x

Pros & Cons

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile

Fujifilm XF 16mm f/1.4 R WR 16mm

  • Strong social proof (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
  • Strong build (81st percentile)81st %ile
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)

Pricing

Fujifilm XF 16mm f/1.4 R WR 16mm is £310 cheaper (1.5x less).

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Fujifilm XF 16mm f/1.4 R WR 16mm

Verdict

Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 95 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider