Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
95 Overall Score
vs
Swarovski TLS APO 49332 23mm

Swarovski TLS APO 49332 23mm

Swarovski
41 Overall Score

Scores

Professional
Nikon
95
Swarovski
41
Portrait
Nikon
89
Swarovski
57
Street
Nikon
86
Swarovski
51
Budget
Nikon
86
Swarovski
40
Macro
Nikon
85
Swarovski
25
Landscape
Nikon
83
Swarovski
29
Video Cinema
Nikon
83
Swarovski
42
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
78
Swarovski
43
Travel
Nikon
75
Swarovski
30

Specifications

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8Swarovski TLS APO 49332 23mm
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min17 mm23 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm23 mm
Elements13
Groups11
Aspherical Elements3
ED Elements3
CoatingMulti-CoatedApochromatic
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8
Min Aperturef/2.8
Constant
Diaphragm Blades9
Build
MountNikon ZT2
Formatfull-framemicro-four-thirds
Weather Sealed
Weight0.45 kg0.33 kg
Filter Thread67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping Motor
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance190 mm
Max Magnification1:5.26

Pros & Cons

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile

Swarovski TLS APO 49332 23mm

  • Strong aperture (67th percentile)
  • Strong bokeh (66th percentile)
  • Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average social proof (21st percentile)
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)

Pricing

Both products are similarly priced.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.80.102score per dollar
vs
Swarovski TLS APO 49332 23mm0.048score per dollar

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 offers 2.1x better value for money

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Swarovski TLS APO 49332 23mm

Verdict

Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 95 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 9 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider