Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
95 Overall Score
vs
Tamron AF020N700 28-300mm

Tamron AF020N700 28-300mm

Tamron
55 Overall Score

Scores

Professional
Nikon
95
Tamron
43
Portrait
Nikon
89
Tamron
52
Street
Nikon
86
Tamron
46
Budget
Nikon
86
Tamron
63
Macro
Nikon
85
Tamron
76
Landscape
Nikon
83
Tamron
49
Video Cinema
Nikon
83
Tamron
47
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
78
Tamron
46
Travel
Nikon
75
Tamron
50

Specifications

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8Tamron AF020N700 28-300mm
Optics
Typezoommacro
Focal Length Min17 mm28 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm300 mm
Elements13
Groups11
Aspherical Elements3
ED Elements3
CoatingMulti-CoatedXR Di VC
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/6.3
Min Aperturef/2.83.5-6.3
Constant
Diaphragm Blades9
Build
MountNikon ZNikon F
Formatfull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight0.45 kg0.54 kg
Filter Thread67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping MotorBuilt in Motor
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance190 mm67 mm
Max Magnification1:5.26

Pros & Cons

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile

Tamron AF020N700 28-300mm

  • Strong versatility (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong macro (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Below average user sentiment (2nd percentile)2nd %ile
  • Below average build (24th percentile)

Pricing

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Tamron AF020N700 28-300mm

No current pricing available

Verdict

Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 95 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 9 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider