Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
95 Overall Score
vs
Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM

Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM

Canon
61 Overall Score

Scores

Professional
Nikon
95
Canon
52
Portrait
Nikon
89
Canon
42
Street
Nikon
86
Canon
60
Budget
Nikon
86
Canon
70
Macro
Nikon
85
Canon
51
Landscape
Nikon
83
Canon
67
Video Cinema
Nikon
83
Canon
50
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
78
Canon
58
Travel
Nikon
75
Canon
60

Specifications

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min17 mm10 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm22 mm
Elements1313
Groups1110
Aspherical Elements33
ED Elements31
CoatingMulti-CoatedSuper Spectra coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.822-27
Min Aperturef/2.83.5-4.5
Constant
Diaphragm Blades96
Build
MountNikon ZCanon EF-S
Formatfull-frameAPS-C
Weather Sealed
Weight0.45 kg0.39 kg
Filter Thread67 mm77 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping MotorUSM
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance190 mm240 mm
Max Magnification1:5.260.17x

Pros & Cons

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile

Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM

  • Strong af (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong social proof (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong optical (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
  • Strong versatility (75th percentile)
  • Below average bokeh (6th percentile)6th %ile
  • Below average aperture (21st percentile)

Pricing

Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM is £287 cheaper (1.4x less).

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM

Verdict

Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 95 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider