Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
95 Overall Score
vs
Sigma Sports 60-600mm f/4.5-6.3 DG OS HSM

Sigma Sports 60-600mm f/4.5-6.3 DG OS HSM

Sigma
39 Overall Score

Scores

Professional
Nikon
95
Sigma
40
Portrait
Nikon
89
Sigma
46
Street
Nikon
86
Sigma
41
Budget
Nikon
86
Sigma
49
Macro
Nikon
85
Sigma
15
Landscape
Nikon
83
Sigma
33
Video Cinema
Nikon
83
Sigma
42
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
78
Sigma
39
Travel
Nikon
75
Sigma
41

Specifications

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8Sigma Sports 60-600mm f/4.5-6.3 DG OS HSM
Optics
Typezoom
Focal Length Min17 mm60 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm600 mm
Elements13
Groups11
Aspherical Elements3
ED Elements3
CoatingMulti-Coated
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/4.5
Min Aperturef/2.8
Constant
Diaphragm Blades9
Build
MountNikon Znikon_f
Formatfull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight0.45 kg
Filter Thread67 mm105 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping MotorAutofocus
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance190 mm
Max Magnification1:5.26

Pros & Cons

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile

Sigma Sports 60-600mm f/4.5-6.3 DG OS HSM

  • Strong versatility (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average optical (21st percentile)

Pricing

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Sigma Sports 60-600mm f/4.5-6.3 DG OS HSM

No current pricing available

Verdict

Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 95 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 9 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider