Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
95 Overall Score
vs
Viltrox AF 40mm f/2.5 FE 40mm

Viltrox AF 40mm f/2.5 FE 40mm

Viltrox
66 Overall Score

Scores

Professional
Nikon
95
Viltrox
63
Portrait
Nikon
89
Viltrox
53
Street
Nikon
86
Viltrox
72
Budget
Nikon
86
Viltrox
64
Macro
Nikon
85
Viltrox
62
Landscape
Nikon
83
Viltrox
64
Video Cinema
Nikon
83
Viltrox
53
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
78
Viltrox
65
Travel
Nikon
75
Viltrox
67

Specifications

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8Viltrox AF 40mm f/2.5 FE 40mm
Optics
Typezoomprime
Focal Length Min17 mm40 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm40 mm
Elements1310
Groups116
Aspherical Elements31
ED Elements31
CoatingMulti-Coatedhigh-definition nano multi-layer coating, front lens waterproof and anti-fouling coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/16
Min Aperturef/2.8f/2.5
Constant
Diaphragm Blades97
Build
MountNikon ZSony E
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight0.45 kg0.17 kg
Filter Thread67 mm52 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping MotorSTM
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance190 mm340 mm
Max Magnification1:5.261:7.14

Pros & Cons

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile

Viltrox AF 40mm f/2.5 FE 40mm

  • Strong build (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong social proof (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong macro (67th percentile)
  • Below average bokeh (30th percentile)
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)

Pricing

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Viltrox AF 40mm f/2.5 FE 40mm

No current pricing available

Verdict

Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 95 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider