Rokinon AF 35-150mm f/2-2.8 150mm
Rokinon
61 Overall Score
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Nikon
95 Overall Score
Scores
Professional
Portrait
Street
Budget
Macro
Landscape
Video Cinema
Wildlife Sports
Travel
Specifications
| Rokinon AF 35-150mm f/2-2.8 150mm | Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | zoom | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 35 mm | 17 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 150 mm | 28 mm |
| Elements | 21 | 13 |
| Groups | 18 | 11 |
| Aspherical Elements | 2 | 3★ |
| ED Elements | 6★ | 3 |
| Coating | Ultra Multi-Coating (UMC) | Multi-Coated |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | 16-22★ | f/2.8 |
| Min Aperture | 2-2.8 | f/2.8 |
| Constant | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 9 | 9 |
| Build | ||
| Mount | L-Mount | Nikon Z |
| Format | full-frame | full-frame |
| Weather Sealed | ✓ | ✓ |
| Weight | 1.31 kg | 0.45 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | 82 mm | 67 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | linear stepping motor | Stepping Motor |
| Stabilization | ✗ | ✗ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 330 mm | 190 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | 1:5.7 | 1:5.26 |
Pros & Cons
Rokinon AF 35-150mm f/2-2.8 150mm
- Strong optical (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong versatility (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong macro (68th percentile)
- Below average user sentiment (1st percentile)1st %ile
- Below average build (24th percentile)
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
- Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
Pricing
Rokinon AF 35-150mm f/2-2.8 150mm0.083score per dollar
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.80.102score per dollar
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 offers 1.2x better value for money
Rokinon AF 35-150mm f/2-2.8 150mm
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Verdict
Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Scores 95 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 4 of 21 specs.
