Canon RF14-35mm F4L IS USM 14-35mm
Canon
79 Overall Score
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Nikon
95 Overall Score
Scores
Professional
Landscape
Portrait
Street
Budget
Video Cinema
Macro
Wildlife Sports
Travel
Specifications
| Canon RF14-35mm F4L IS USM 14-35mm | Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | zoom | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 14 mm | 17 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 35 mm | 28 mm |
| Elements | 16 | 13 |
| Groups | 12 | 11 |
| Aspherical Elements | 3 | 3 |
| ED Elements | 3 | 3 |
| Coating | SWC and ASC | Multi-Coated |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/22 | f/2.8 |
| Min Aperture | f/4 | f/2.8 |
| Constant | ✓ | ✓ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 9 | 9 |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Canon RF | Nikon Z |
| Format | full-frame | full-frame |
| Weather Sealed | ✓ | ✓ |
| Weight | 0.54 kg | 0.45 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | 77 mm | 67 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Nano USM★ | Stepping Motor |
| Stabilization | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Stabilization Stops | 5.5 stops★ | — |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 201 mm | 190 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | 0.38x | 1:5.26★ |
Pros & Cons
Canon RF14-35mm F4L IS USM 14-35mm
- Strong stabilization (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong af (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong optical (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong social proof (85th percentile)85th %ile
- Below average aperture (21st percentile)
- Below average bokeh (24th percentile)
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
- Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
Pricing
Canon RF14-35mm F4L IS USM 14-35mm0.059score per dollar
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.80.102score per dollar
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 offers 1.7x better value for money
Canon RF14-35mm F4L IS USM 14-35mm
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Verdict
Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Scores 95 overall, wins 5 of 9 usage categories and 3 of 22 specs.
