Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

Sigma
91 Overall Score
vs
Fujifilm XF 35mm f/2 R WR 35mm

Fujifilm XF 35mm f/2 R WR 35mm

Fujifilm
67 Overall Score

Scores

Professional
Sigma
98
Fujifilm
74
Portrait
Sigma
90
Fujifilm
58
Street
Sigma
88
Fujifilm
76
Budget
Sigma
85
Fujifilm
68
Video Cinema
Sigma
85
Fujifilm
65
Macro
Sigma
83
Fujifilm
50
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
80
Fujifilm
67
Landscape
Sigma
77
Fujifilm
60
Travel
Sigma
75
Fujifilm
69

Specifications

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mmFujifilm XF 35mm f/2 R WR 35mm
Optics
Typezoomprime
Focal Length Min16 mm35 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm35 mm
Elements169
Groups116
Aspherical Elements42
ED Elements52
CoatingSuper Multi-Layer CoatingNano-GI coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/16
Min Aperturef/2.8f/2
Constant
Diaphragm Blades99
Build
MountSony EFujifilm X
Formatfull-frameAPS-C
Weather Sealed
Weight0.45 kg0.17 kg
Filter Thread72 mm43 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping AF Motorstepping motor
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance250 mm350 mm
Max Magnification1:5.550.135x

Pros & Cons

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

  • Strong optical (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong aperture (85th percentile)85th %ile

Fujifilm XF 35mm f/2 R WR 35mm

  • Strong build (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong social proof (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong optical (67th percentile)
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)
  • Below average macro (34th percentile)

Pricing

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

No current pricing available

Fujifilm XF 35mm f/2 R WR 35mm

Verdict

Winner: Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 21 specs.

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider