Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

Sigma
91 Overall Score
vs
Tamron Di III 28-75mm f/2.8 Di III VXD G2

Tamron Di III 28-75mm f/2.8 Di III VXD G2

Tamron
93 Overall Score

Scores

Professional
Sigma
98
Tamron
89
Portrait
Sigma
90
Tamron
87
Street
Sigma
88
Tamron
76
Budget
Sigma
85
Tamron
88
Video Cinema
Sigma
85
Tamron
86
Macro
Sigma
83
Tamron
84
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
80
Tamron
69
Landscape
Sigma
77
Tamron
77
Travel
Sigma
75
Tamron
72

Specifications

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mmTamron Di III 28-75mm f/2.8 Di III VXD G2
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min16 mm28 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm75 mm
Elements1617
Groups1115
Aspherical Elements41
ED Elements52
CoatingSuper Multi-Layer CoatingFluorine Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/2.8
Min Aperturef/2.8f/2.8
Constant
Diaphragm Blades99
Build
MountSony ESony E
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight0.45 kg0.54 kg
Filter Thread72 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping AF MotorVXD
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance250 mm180 mm
Max Magnification1:5.551:2.7

Pros & Cons

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

  • Strong optical (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong aperture (85th percentile)85th %ile

Tamron Di III 28-75mm f/2.8 Di III VXD G2

  • Strong optical (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong macro (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong social proof (85th percentile)85th %ile

Pricing

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

No current pricing available

Tamron Di III 28-75mm f/2.8 Di III VXD G2

Verdict

Tie

Both products are closely matched - Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm wins 3 specs while Tamron Di III 28-75mm f/2.8 Di III VXD G2 wins 1.

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm Better at:

StreetTravelPortraitProfessionalWildlife Sports

Tamron Di III 28-75mm f/2.8 Di III VXD G2 Better at:

Budget

Also Consider