Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

Sigma
91 Overall Score
vs
Fujifilm XF 56mm f/1.2 R WR 50mm

Fujifilm XF 56mm f/1.2 R WR 50mm

Fujifilm
56 Overall Score

Scores

Professional
Sigma
98
Fujifilm
65
Portrait
Sigma
90
Fujifilm
54
Street
Sigma
88
Fujifilm
58
Budget
Sigma
85
Fujifilm
56
Video Cinema
Sigma
85
Fujifilm
62
Macro
Sigma
83
Fujifilm
46
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
80
Fujifilm
53
Landscape
Sigma
77
Fujifilm
54
Travel
Sigma
75
Fujifilm
51

Specifications

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mmFujifilm XF 56mm f/1.2 R WR 50mm
Optics
Typezoomprime
Focal Length Min16 mm56 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm56 mm
Elements1613
Groups118
Aspherical Elements42
ED Elements51
CoatingSuper Multi-Layer CoatingFluorine coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/16
Min Aperturef/2.8f/1.2
Constant
Diaphragm Blades911
Build
MountSony EFujifilm X
Formatfull-frameAPS-C
Weather Sealed
Weight0.45 kg0.45 kg
Filter Thread72 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping AF MotorAutofocus
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance250 mm500 mm
Max Magnification1:5.550.14x

Pros & Cons

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

  • Strong optical (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong aperture (85th percentile)85th %ile

Fujifilm XF 56mm f/1.2 R WR 50mm

  • Strong social proof (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong build (76th percentile)
  • Strong optical (75th percentile)
  • Below average macro (32nd percentile)
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)

Pricing

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

No current pricing available

Fujifilm XF 56mm f/1.2 R WR 50mm

Verdict

Winner: Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 21 specs.

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider