Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

Sigma
91 Overall Score
vs
AstrHori Mirrorless Lenses 12mm f/2.8 Fisheye 12mm

AstrHori Mirrorless Lenses 12mm f/2.8 Fisheye 12mm

AstrHori
29 Overall Score

Scores

Professional
Sigma
98
AstrHori
27
Portrait
Sigma
90
AstrHori
25
Street
Sigma
88
AstrHori
22
Budget
Sigma
85
AstrHori
23
Video Cinema
Sigma
85
AstrHori
19
Macro
Sigma
83
AstrHori
50
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
80
AstrHori
20
Landscape
Sigma
77
AstrHori
35
Travel
Sigma
75
AstrHori
21

Specifications

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mmAstrHori Mirrorless Lenses 12mm f/2.8 Fisheye 12mm
Optics
Typezoomfisheye
Focal Length Min16 mm12 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm12 mm
Elements1611
Groups118
Aspherical Elements4
ED Elements5
CoatingSuper Multi-Layer CoatingWaterproof multilayer coatings
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/16
Min Aperturef/2.8f/2.8
Constant
Diaphragm Blades95
Build
MountSony ECanon RF
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight0.45 kg0.76 kg
Filter Thread72 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping AF Motormanual focus only
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance250 mm200 mm
Max Magnification1:5.55

Pros & Cons

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

  • Strong optical (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong aperture (85th percentile)85th %ile

AstrHori Mirrorless Lenses 12mm f/2.8 Fisheye 12mm

  • Strong macro (84th percentile)84th %ile
  • Below average bokeh (9th percentile)9th %ile
  • Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average social proof (26th percentile)
  • Below average build (28th percentile)

Verdict

Winner: Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 21 specs.

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports