Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

Sigma
91 Overall Score
vs
Nikon NIKKOR 2190 85mm

Nikon NIKKOR 2190 85mm

Nikon
60 Overall Score

Scores

Professional
Sigma
98
Nikon
43
Portrait
Sigma
90
Nikon
30
Street
Sigma
88
Nikon
43
Budget
Sigma
85
Nikon
46
Video Cinema
Sigma
85
Nikon
42
Macro
Sigma
83
Nikon
65
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
80
Nikon
45
Landscape
Sigma
77
Nikon
49
Travel
Sigma
75
Nikon
44

Specifications

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mmNikon NIKKOR 2190 85mm
Optics
Typezoommacro
Focal Length Min16 mm85 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm85 mm
Elements1614
Groups1110
Aspherical Elements40
ED Elements51
CoatingSuper Multi-Layer CoatingSuper Integrated Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/32
Min Aperturef/2.8f/3.5
Constant
Diaphragm Blades99
Build
MountSony ENikon F
Formatfull-frameAPS-C
Weather Sealed
Weight0.45 kg0.35 kg
Filter Thread72 mm52 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping AF MotorSilent Wave Motor
Stabilization
Stabilization Stops3 stops
Focus
Min Focus Distance250 mm286 mm
Max Magnification1:5.551:1

Pros & Cons

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

  • Strong optical (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong aperture (85th percentile)85th %ile

Nikon NIKKOR 2190 85mm

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong social proof (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Strong macro (74th percentile)
  • Below average aperture (5th percentile)5th %ile
  • Below average bokeh (8th percentile)8th %ile
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)

Verdict

Winner: Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 22 specs.

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports