Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

Sigma
91 Overall Score
vs
Fujifilm XF 33mm f/1.4 R LM WR 33mm

Fujifilm XF 33mm f/1.4 R LM WR 33mm

Fujifilm
75 Overall Score

Scores

Professional
Sigma
98
Fujifilm
80
Portrait
Sigma
90
Fujifilm
60
Street
Sigma
88
Fujifilm
70
Budget
Sigma
85
Fujifilm
66
Video Cinema
Sigma
85
Fujifilm
75
Macro
Sigma
83
Fujifilm
72
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
80
Fujifilm
70
Landscape
Sigma
77
Fujifilm
64
Travel
Sigma
75
Fujifilm
60

Specifications

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mmFujifilm XF 33mm f/1.4 R LM WR 33mm
Optics
Typezoomprime
Focal Length Min16 mm33 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm33 mm
Elements1615
Groups1110
Aspherical Elements42
ED Elements53
CoatingSuper Multi-Layer CoatingMulti-Coated
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/16
Min Aperturef/2.8f/1.4
Constant
Diaphragm Blades99
Build
MountSony EFujifilm X
Formatfull-frameAPS-C
Weather Sealed
Weight0.45 kg0.36 kg
Filter Thread72 mm58 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping AF MotorLinear motor
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance250 mm300 mm
Max Magnification1:5.551:6.67

Pros & Cons

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

  • Strong optical (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong aperture (85th percentile)85th %ile

Fujifilm XF 33mm f/1.4 R LM WR 33mm

  • Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong optical (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong social proof (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong build (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)

Verdict

Winner: Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 4 of 21 specs.

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports