Leica Noctilux-M 35mm f/1.2 ASPH. 35mm

Leica Noctilux-M 35mm f/1.2 ASPH. 35mm

Leica
50 Overall Score
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
95 Overall Score

Scores

Professional
Leica
56
Nikon
95
Portrait
Leica
74
Nikon
89
Street
Leica
56
Nikon
86
Budget
Leica
41
Nikon
86
Macro
Leica
52
Nikon
85
Landscape
Leica
33
Nikon
83
Video Cinema
Leica
53
Nikon
83
Wildlife Sports
Leica
35
Nikon
78
Travel
Leica
30
Nikon
75

Specifications

Leica Noctilux-M 35mm f/1.2 ASPH. 35mmNikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Optics
Typeprimezoom
Focal Length Min35 mm17 mm
Focal Length Max35 mm28 mm
Elements1013
Groups511
Aspherical Elements33
ED Elements3
CoatingMulti-Coated
Aperture
Max Aperturef/1.2f/2.8
Min Aperturef/1.2f/2.8
Constant
Diaphragm Blades119
Build
MountLeica MNikon Z
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight0.42 kg0.45 kg
Filter Thread49 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF Typemanual focus onlyStepping Motor
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance500 mm190 mm
Max Magnification1:11.61:5.26

Pros & Cons

Leica Noctilux-M 35mm f/1.2 ASPH. 35mm

  • Strong bokeh (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong aperture (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile

Pricing

Leica Noctilux-M 35mm f/1.2 ASPH. 35mm

No current pricing available

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Verdict

Winner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 95 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 4 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider