SJCAM C400

SJCAM C400

SJCAM
50 Overall Score
vs
Polaroid

Polaroid

Polaroid
19 Overall Score

Scores

Youtube
SJCAM
62
Polaroid
13
Video
SJCAM
57
Polaroid
16
Vlogging
SJCAM
53
Polaroid
14
Beginner
SJCAM
51
Polaroid
19
Streaming
SJCAM
48
Polaroid
17
Wedding Events
SJCAM
47
Polaroid
15
Travel
SJCAM
47
Polaroid
15
Product Photography
SJCAM
45
Polaroid
18
Sports Wildlife
SJCAM
45
Polaroid
16
Photography
SJCAM
42
Polaroid
20

Specifications

SJCAM C400Polaroid
Sensor
TypeCMOS—
Video
Max Resolution4K★—
Log Profile✓★—
CodecMP4—
Display & EVF
Screen Size2.3"★—
Touchscreen✓★—
Articulating✓★—
Build
Weather Sealed✓★—
Weight0.78 kg0.45 kg★
Connectivity
Wi-Fi✓★—
Bluetooth✗—

Pros & Cons

SJCAM C400

  • Strong build (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong display (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (78th percentile)
  • Strong social proof (77th percentile)
  • Below average sensor (29th percentile)
  • Below average burst (34th percentile)

Polaroid

  • Below average build (18th percentile)18th %ile
  • Below average connectivity (21st percentile)
  • Below average video (24th percentile)
  • Below average sensor (29th percentile)

Pricing

Polaroid is £272 cheaper (4.2x less).

SJCAM C4000.139score per dollar
vs
Polaroid0.227score per dollar

Polaroid offers 1.6x better value for money

Verdict

★ Winner: SJCAM C400

Scores 50 overall, wins 10 of 10 usage categories and 7 of 11 specs.

SJCAM C400 Better at:

VideoTravelYoutubeBeginnerVloggingStreamingPhotographyWedding EventsSports WildlifeProduct Photography

Also Consider