Reolink TrackFlex Floodlight WiFi TrackFlex Floodlight WiFi
Reolink
34 Overall Score
vs
OM System OM-1 OM-1 Black
OM System
88 Overall Score
Scores
Sports Wildlife
Beginner
Wedding Events
Video
Youtube
Photography
Travel
Vlogging
Product Photography
Streaming
Specifications
| Reolink TrackFlex Floodlight WiFi TrackFlex Floodlight WiFi | OM System OM-1 OM-1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor | ||
| Type | — | BSI MOS |
| Size | — | micro-four-thirds |
| Megapixels | — | 20.399999618530273 MP★ |
| ISO Range | — | 200★ |
| Autofocus | ||
| AF Points | No data | |
| AF Type | — | Photo, VideoPhase Detection: 1053 |
| Eye AF | — | ✓★ |
| Subject Detection | ✓★ | — |
| Shooting | ||
| Burst (Mechanical) | — | 10 fps★ |
| Burst (Electronic) | — | 120 fps★ |
| Max Shutter | — | 1/32000 |
| Electronic Shutter | — | ✓★ |
| Video | ||
| Max Resolution | 4K | 4K |
| 4K FPS | — | 60 fps★ |
| 1080p FPS | — | 240 fps★ |
| 10-bit | — | ✓★ |
| Log Profile | — | ✓★ |
| RAW Video | — | ✓★ |
| Codec | — | H.264, H.265 |
| Display & EVF | ||
| Screen Size | — | 3"★ |
| Touchscreen | — | ✓★ |
| Articulating | — | ✓★ |
| EVF Resolution | — | 5.8M dots★ |
| Build | ||
| Weather Sealed | ✓ | ✓ |
| Weight | — | 0.51 kg★ |
| Battery Life | — | 520 shots★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bluetooth | ✓★ | ✗ |
| USB | — | USB-C★ |
| HDMI | — | Micro-HDMI |
| Hot Shoe | — | ✓★ |
Pros & Cons
Reolink TrackFlex Floodlight WiFi TrackFlex Floodlight WiFi
- Strong build (81st percentile)81st %ile
- Strong social proof (75th percentile)
- Strong af (67th percentile)
- Below average display (28th percentile)
- Below average sensor (29th percentile)
- Below average burst (32nd percentile)
- Below average stabilization (34th percentile)
OM System OM-1 OM-1 Black
- Strong evf (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong af (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong battery (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong burst (94th percentile)94th %ile
Verdict
Winner: OM System OM-1 OM-1
Scores 88 overall, wins 10 of 10 usage categories and 20 of 31 specs.