Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

Sigma
91 Score global
vs
Canon L RF 100-300mm f/2.8 L IS USM

Canon L RF 100-300mm f/2.8 L IS USM

Canon
66 Score global

Scores

Professional
Sigma
98
Canon
71
Portrait
Sigma
90
Canon
49
Street
Sigma
88
Canon
56
Budget
Sigma
85
Canon
66
Video Cinema
Sigma
85
Canon
66
Macro
Sigma
83
Canon
59
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
80
Canon
78
Landscape
Sigma
77
Canon
73
Travel
Sigma
75
Canon
61

Spécifications

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mmCanon L RF 100-300mm f/2.8 L IS USM
Optics
Typezoomtelephoto
Focal Length Min16 mm100 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm300 mm
Elements1623
Groups1118
Aspherical Elements41
ED Elements54
CoatingSuper Multi-Layer CoatingASC, SSC, and Fluorine Coatings
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/22
Min Aperturef/2.8f/2.8
Constant
Diaphragm Blades99
Build
MountSony ECanon RF
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight0.45 kg2.59 kg
Filter Thread72 mm112 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping AF MotorDual Nano USM
Stabilization
Stabilization Stops5.5 stops
Focus
Min Focus Distance250 mm1.80 m
Max Magnification1:5.551:6.25

Avantages & Inconvénients

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

  • Strong optical (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong aperture (85th percentile)85th %ile

Canon L RF 100-300mm f/2.8 L IS USM

  • Strong optical (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong af (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong versatility (81st percentile)81st %ile
  • Below average build (11th percentile)11th %ile
  • Below average aperture (21st percentile)
  • Below average bokeh (24th percentile)

Verdict

Gagnant: Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 4 of 22 specs.

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm Meilleur pour:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports