Tamron AFB016C-700 16-300mm
Tamron
54 Score global
vs
Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS
Sony
90 Score global
Scores
Budget
Street
Travel
Wildlife Sports
Portrait
Video Cinema
Professional
Landscape
Macro
Spécifications
| Tamron AFB016C-700 16-300mm | Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | telephoto | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 16 mm | 18 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 300 mm | 135 mm |
| Elements | — | 16 |
| Groups | — | 12 |
| Aspherical Elements | — | 1★ |
| ED Elements | — | 2★ |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/3.5 | f/3.5 |
| Min Aperture | — | 3.5-5.6 |
| Constant | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Diaphragm Blades | — | 7★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Canon EF-S | Sony E |
| Format | — | APS-C★ |
| Weight | 0.54 kg | 0.33 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | — | 55 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Autofocus | Linear motor★ |
| Stabilization | — | ✓★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 300 mm★ | 450 mm |
| Max Magnification | — | 0.29x★ |
Avantages & Inconvénients
Tamron AFB016C-700 16-300mm
- Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong aperture (78th percentile)
- Strong bokeh (76th percentile)
- Strong macro (71st percentile)
- Below average optical (20th percentile)20th %ile
- Below average build (22nd percentile)
- Below average user sentiment (30th percentile)
Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS
- Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong versatility (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong stabilization (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
Prix
Tamron AFB016C-700 16-300mm0.126score par dollar
vs
Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS0.163score par dollar
Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS offre un rapport qualité-prix 1.3x meilleur
Verdict
Gagnant: Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS
Scores 90 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 19 specs.
