Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

Sigma
91 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Viltrox AF 40mm F2.5 40mm

Viltrox AF 40mm F2.5 40mm

Viltrox
80 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Professional
Sigma
98
Viltrox
61
Portrait
Sigma
90
Viltrox
79
Street
Sigma
88
Viltrox
71
Budget
Sigma
85
Viltrox
67
Video Cinema
Sigma
85
Viltrox
66
Macro
Sigma
83
Viltrox
80
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
80
Viltrox
60
Landscape
Sigma
77
Viltrox
44
Travel
Sigma
75
Viltrox
45

Spezifikationen

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mmViltrox AF 40mm F2.5 40mm
Optics
Typezoom
Focal Length Min16 mm40 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm40 mm
Elements1610
Groups116
Aspherical Elements4
ED Elements5
CoatingSuper Multi-Layer Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/2.5
Min Aperturef/2.8
Constant
Diaphragm Blades9
Build
MountSony ENikon Z
Formatfull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight0.45 kg0.40 kg
Filter Thread72 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping AF MotorSTM
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance250 mm40 mm
Max Magnification1:5.55

Vor- & Nachteile

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

  • Strong optical (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong aperture (85th percentile)85th %ile

Viltrox AF 40mm F2.5 40mm

  • Strong macro (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong aperture (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)

Fazit

Gewinner: Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 21 specs.

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm Besser bei:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports