Fujifilm GF GF20-35mmF4 R WR 35-28mm

Fujifilm GF GF20-35mmF4 R WR 35-28mm

Fujifilm
58 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM

Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM

Canon
89 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Macro
Fujifilm
46
Canon
91
Landscape
Fujifilm
61
Canon
83
Video Cinema
Fujifilm
54
Canon
83
Professional
Fujifilm
65
Canon
82
Travel
Fujifilm
53
Canon
82
Budget
Fujifilm
54
Canon
80
Wildlife Sports
Fujifilm
60
Canon
79
Street
Fujifilm
53
Canon
68
Portrait
Fujifilm
44
Canon
53

Spezifikationen

Fujifilm GF GF20-35mmF4 R WR 35-28mmCanon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min20 mm28 mm
Focal Length Max35 mm70 mm
Elements1415
Groups1012
Aspherical Elements32
ED Elements42
CoatingNano GI coatingSuper Spectra Coating (SSC)
Aperture
Max Aperturef/22f/22
Min Aperturef/4f/2.8
Constant
Diaphragm Blades99
Build
MountFujifilm GCanon RF
Formatmedium-formatfull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight0.72 kg0.49 kg
Filter Thread82 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF Typestepping motorSTM
Stabilization
Stabilization Stops5.5 stops
Focus
Min Focus Distance350 mm239 mm
Max Magnification0.14x1:4.2

Vor- & Nachteile

Fujifilm GF GF20-35mmF4 R WR 35-28mm

  • Strong user sentiment (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong optical (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong versatility (68th percentile)
  • Below average aperture (21st percentile)
  • Below average bokeh (24th percentile)
  • Below average macro (35th percentile)

Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM

  • Strong stabilization (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong social proof (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Below average aperture (21st percentile)
  • Below average bokeh (24th percentile)

Fazit

Gewinner: Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM

Scores 89 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 22 specs.

Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM Besser bei:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports