MSI MAG 271QPX QD-OLED E2 27" ブラック 2026

MSI MAG 271QPX QD-OLED E2 27" ブラック 2026

MSI
95 Overall Score
vs
ASUS Xg438qr Gaming Bk/4ms 43"

ASUS Xg438qr Gaming Bk/4ms 43"

ASUS
16 Overall Score

Scores

Office
MSI
87
ASUS
14
Professional
MSI
85
ASUS
20
Gaming
MSI
84
ASUS
28
Creative
MSI
84
ASUS
23
Entertainment
MSI
76
ASUS
26
Portable
MSI
14
ASUS
5

Specifications

MSI MAG 271QPX QD-OLED E2 27"ASUS Xg438qr Gaming Bk/4ms 43"
Display
Size27"43"
Resolution2560 x 14403840 x 2160
Panel TypeQD-OLED
Aspect Ratio16:9
Curved
Performance
Refresh Rate240 Hz
Response Time0.029999999329447746 ms
Adaptive SyncFreeSync Premium Pro
Color & HDR
Brightness1000 nits
Color Gamut99% DCI-P3
Color Depth10-bit
HDRDisplayHDR True Black 400
HDR SupportHDR
Connectivity
HDMI Ports2
DisplayPort1
USB-C1
Speakers
Headphone Jack
Ergonomics
Height Adjustable
Tilt
Swivel
Pivot
VESA Mount100x100
Features
Webcam
Touchscreen
PIP/PBP
Weight8.00 kg

Pros & Cons

MSI MAG 271QPX QD-OLED E2 27" ブラック 2026

  • Strong social proof (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong color (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong performance (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (96th percentile)96th %ile

ASUS Xg438qr Gaming Bk/4ms 43"

  • Strong display (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Below average portability (4th percentile)4th %ile
  • Below average connectivity (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average ergonomic (15th percentile)15th %ile
  • Below average social proof (16th percentile)16th %ile

Pricing

MSI MAG 271QPX QD-OLED E2 27" ブラック 2026 is CA$1,469 cheaper (2.6x less).

MSI MAG 271QPX QD-OLED E2 27" ブラック 20260.102score per dollar
vs
ASUS Xg438qr Gaming Bk/4ms 43"0.006score per dollar

MSI MAG 271QPX QD-OLED E2 27" ブラック 2026 offers 17.0x better value for money

MSI MAG 271QPX QD-OLED E2 27" ブラック 2026

ASUS Xg438qr Gaming Bk/4ms 43"

Verdict

Winner: MSI MAG 271QPX QD-OLED E2 27"

Scores 95 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 16 of 27 specs.

MSI MAG 271QPX QD-OLED E2 27" Better at:

GamingOfficeCreativePortableProfessionalEntertainment

Also Consider