Pixio PX278 Wave Blue PX278WAVEB 27" 2024
Pixio
65 Overall Score
vs
Samsung Odyssey OLED G6 G60SF 27" Silver 2025
Samsung
92 Overall Score
Scores
Office
Creative
Gaming
Professional
Entertainment
Portable
Specifications
| Pixio PX278 Wave Blue PX278WAVEB 27" | Samsung Odyssey OLED G6 G60SF 27" | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | ||
| Size | 27" | 27" |
| Resolution | 2560 x 1440 | 2560 x 1440 |
| Panel Type | IPS | QD-OLED★ |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Curved | ✗ | ✗ |
| Performance | ||
| Refresh Rate | 180 Hz | 500 Hz★ |
| Response Time | 1 ms | 0.029999999329447746 ms★ |
| Adaptive Sync | FreeSync | FreeSync Premium Pro★ |
| Color & HDR | ||
| Brightness | 350 nits★ | 300 nits |
| Color Gamut | 135.76% sRGB | 96.50% DCI-P3 | 92.95% NTSC | 99% (CIE1976) |
| Color Depth | — | 10-bit★ |
| HDR | — | HDR10+ |
| HDR Support | — | HDR10+★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI Ports | 2 | 2 |
| DisplayPort | 1 | 1 |
| USB-C | — | 3★ |
| Speakers | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Headphone Jack | — | ✓★ |
| Ergonomics | ||
| Height Adjustable | — | ✓★ |
| Tilt | — | ✓★ |
| Swivel | — | ✓★ |
| Pivot | — | ✓★ |
| VESA Mount | 75x75 | 100x100 |
| Features | ||
| Webcam | — | ✗ |
| Touchscreen | — | ✗ |
| PIP/PBP | — | ✗ |
| Power | — | 140W★ |
| Weight | 6.43 kg★ | 6.90 kg |
Pros & Cons
Pixio PX278 Wave Blue PX278WAVEB 27" 2024
- Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (89th percentile)89th %ile
- Strong performance (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Strong color (74th percentile)
- Below average feature (23rd percentile)
Samsung Odyssey OLED G6 G60SF 27" Silver 2025
- Strong performance (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong connectivity (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong ergonomic (91st percentile)91st %ile
Pricing
Pixio PX278 Wave Blue PX278WAVEB 27" 20240.180score per dollar
vs
Samsung Odyssey OLED G6 G60SF 27" Silver 20250.081score per dollar
Pixio PX278 Wave Blue PX278WAVEB 27" 2024 offers 2.2x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: Samsung Odyssey OLED G6 G60SF 27"
Scores 92 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 13 of 28 specs.
