Yongnuo YN12-35mm F2.8-4M 12-35mm
Yongnuo
81 Overall Score
vs
Meike 50mm f/0.95 50mm
Meike
44 Overall Score
Scores
Professional
Wildlife Sports
Portrait
Street
Landscape
Video Cinema
Travel
Budget
Macro
Specifications
| Yongnuo YN12-35mm F2.8-4M 12-35mm | Meike 50mm f/0.95 50mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | zoom | prime |
| Focal Length Min | 12 mm | 50 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 35 mm | 50 mm |
| Elements | 14 | 7 |
| Groups | 11 | 5 |
| Aspherical Elements | 4★ | — |
| ED Elements | 3★ | — |
| Coating | Nano Surface Coating | multi-coated |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/2.8 | f/16 |
| Min Aperture | f/2.8 | f/0.95 |
| Constant | ✗ | ✗ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 7 | 13★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Micro Four Thirds | Fujifilm X |
| Format | micro-four-thirds | APS-C★ |
| Weather Sealed | ✓★ | — |
| Weight | 0.32 kg★ | 0.42 kg |
| Filter Thread | 67 mm | 62 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | STM stepping motor★ | manual focus only |
| Stabilization | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 250 mm★ | 450 mm |
| Max Magnification | 0.5x★ | — |
Pros & Cons
Yongnuo YN12-35mm F2.8-4M 12-35mm
- Strong optical (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong build (85th percentile)85th %ile
- Strong aperture (85th percentile)85th %ile
- Below average social proof (35th percentile)
Meike 50mm f/0.95 50mm
- Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
- Below average versatility (33rd percentile)
Pricing
Yongnuo YN12-35mm F2.8-4M 12-35mm0.159score per dollar
vs
Meike 50mm f/0.95 50mm0.128score per dollar
Yongnuo YN12-35mm F2.8-4M 12-35mm offers 1.2x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: Yongnuo YN12-35mm F2.8-4M 12-35mm
Scores 81 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 21 specs.
