Canon RF 24-105mm f/2.8 L IS USM Z
Canon
78 Overall Score
vs
Panasonic Leica DG Vario-Elmarit H-E08018 8-18mm
Panasonic
87 Overall Score
Scores
Street
Portrait
Professional
Wildlife Sports
Video Cinema
Budget
Landscape
Travel
Macro
Specifications
| Canon RF 24-105mm f/2.8 L IS USM Z | Panasonic Leica DG Vario-Elmarit H-E08018 8-18mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | zoom | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 24 mm | 8 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 105 mm | 18 mm |
| Elements | 23 | 15 |
| Groups | 18 | 10 |
| Aspherical Elements | 3 | 4★ |
| ED Elements | 4★ | 3 |
| Coating | Fluorine coating | Nano Surface Coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/22 | f/2.8 |
| Min Aperture | f/2.8 | 2.8-4 |
| Constant | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 11★ | 7 |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Canon RF | Micro Four Thirds |
| Format | full-frame★ | micro-four-thirds |
| Weather Sealed | ✓ | ✓ |
| Weight | 1.31 kg | 0.32 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | 82 mm | 67 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Nano USM | Linear motor★ |
| Stabilization | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Stabilization Stops | 5.5 stops★ | — |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 450 mm | 230 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | 0.29x★ | 0.12x |
Pros & Cons
Canon RF 24-105mm f/2.8 L IS USM Z
- Strong optical (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong stabilization (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong af (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong social proof (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Below average aperture (21st percentile)
- Below average build (24th percentile)
- Below average bokeh (35th percentile)
Panasonic Leica DG Vario-Elmarit H-E08018 8-18mm
- Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong optical (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong build (85th percentile)85th %ile
Pricing
Canon RF 24-105mm f/2.8 L IS USM Z0.019score per dollar
vs
Panasonic Leica DG Vario-Elmarit H-E08018 8-18mm0.060score per dollar
Panasonic Leica DG Vario-Elmarit H-E08018 8-18mm offers 3.2x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: Panasonic Leica DG Vario-Elmarit H-E08018 8-18mm
Scores 87 overall, wins 7 of 9 usage categories and 4 of 22 specs.
