Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm
Panasonic
88 Overall Score
vs
Rokinon Cine 135M-FX 135mm
Rokinon
41 Overall Score
Scores
Macro
Budget
Landscape
Travel
Video Cinema
Professional
Portrait
Street
Wildlife Sports
Specifications
| Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm | Rokinon Cine 135M-FX 135mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | zoom | prime |
| Focal Length Min | 28 mm | 135 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 200 mm | 135 mm |
| Elements | 17 | 11 |
| Groups | 13 | 7 |
| Aspherical Elements | 1★ | 0 |
| ED Elements | 4★ | 1 |
| Coating | Fluorine coating | Ultra Multi-Coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/4 | f/22 |
| Min Aperture | 4-7.1 | f/2 |
| Constant | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 9 | 9 |
| Build | ||
| Mount | L-Mount | Canon EF |
| Format | full-frame | full-frame |
| Weather Sealed | ✓★ | — |
| Weight | 0.41 kg★ | 0.81 kg |
| Filter Thread | 67 mm | 77 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Autofocus | manual focus only |
| Stabilization | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Stabilization Stops | 6.5 stops★ | — |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 140 mm★ | 790 mm |
| Max Magnification | 0.5x★ | — |
Pros & Cons
Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm
- Strong stabilization (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong versatility (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong optical (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong bokeh (80th percentile)80th %ile
- Below average user sentiment (22nd percentile)
Rokinon Cine 135M-FX 135mm
- Strong social proof (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Below average af (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average aperture (23rd percentile)
- Below average build (24th percentile)
- Below average bokeh (26th percentile)
Pricing
Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm0.056score per dollar
vs
Rokinon Cine 135M-FX 135mm0.067score per dollar
Rokinon Cine 135M-FX 135mm offers 1.2x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm
Scores 88 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 22 specs.
