Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm
Panasonic
88 Overall Score
vs
Canon L EF 135mm f/2L USM 135mm
Canon
73 Overall Score
Scores
Macro
Budget
Landscape
Travel
Video Cinema
Portrait
Professional
Street
Wildlife Sports
Specifications
| Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm | Canon L EF 135mm f/2L USM 135mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | zoom | prime |
| Focal Length Min | 28 mm | 135 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 200 mm | 135 mm |
| Elements | 17 | 10 |
| Groups | 13 | 8 |
| Aspherical Elements | 1★ | — |
| ED Elements | 4★ | 2 |
| Coating | Fluorine coating | Super Spectra coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/4 | f/2 |
| Min Aperture | 4-7.1 | f/2 |
| Constant | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 9★ | — |
| Build | ||
| Mount | L-Mount | Canon EF |
| Format | full-frame | full-frame |
| Weather Sealed | ✓★ | — |
| Weight | 0.41 kg★ | 0.89 kg |
| Filter Thread | 67 mm | 72 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Autofocus | USM★ |
| Stabilization | ✓ | ✓ |
| Stabilization Stops | 6.5 stops★ | — |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 140 mm★ | 914 mm |
| Max Magnification | 0.5x★ | 0.19x |
Pros & Cons
Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm
- Strong stabilization (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong versatility (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong optical (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong bokeh (80th percentile)80th %ile
- Below average user sentiment (22nd percentile)
Canon L EF 135mm f/2L USM 135mm
- Strong af (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong aperture (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong bokeh (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong social proof (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Below average build (22nd percentile)
- Below average macro (27th percentile)
- Below average versatility (34th percentile)
Pricing
Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm0.056score per dollar
vs
Canon L EF 135mm f/2L USM 135mm0.065score per dollar
Canon L EF 135mm f/2L USM 135mm offers 1.2x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm
Scores 88 overall, wins 7 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 22 specs.
