Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm
Panasonic
88 Overall Score
vs
Tamron Di III 17-50mm F/4 VXD 4-50mm
Tamron
83 Overall Score
Scores
Professional
Macro
Portrait
Travel
Landscape
Street
Budget
Video Cinema
Wildlife Sports
Specifications
| Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm | Tamron Di III 17-50mm F/4 VXD 4-50mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | zoom | standard-zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 28 mm | 17 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 200 mm | 50 mm |
| Elements | 17 | 15 |
| Groups | 13 | 13 |
| Aspherical Elements | 1 | 3★ |
| ED Elements | 4★ | 3 |
| Coating | Fluorine coating | Fluorine Coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/4 | f/1.4 |
| Min Aperture | 4-7.1 | f/4 |
| Constant | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 9 | 9 |
| Build | ||
| Mount | L-Mount | Canon EF-M |
| Format | full-frame | full-frame |
| Weather Sealed | ✓ | ✓ |
| Weight | 0.41 kg★ | 0.46 kg |
| Filter Thread | 67 mm | 67 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Autofocus | VXD Linear Motor★ |
| Stabilization | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Stabilization Stops | 6.5 stops★ | — |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 140 mm★ | 190 mm |
| Max Magnification | 0.5x | 1:4.6★ |
Pros & Cons
Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm
- Strong stabilization (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong versatility (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong optical (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong bokeh (78th percentile)
- Below average user sentiment (22nd percentile)
Tamron Di III 17-50mm F/4 VXD 4-50mm
- Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong bokeh (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong aperture (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong optical (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Below average social proof (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
- Below average user sentiment (30th percentile)
Pricing
Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm0.056score per dollar
vs
Tamron Di III 17-50mm F/4 VXD 4-50mm0.104score per dollar
Tamron Di III 17-50mm F/4 VXD 4-50mm offers 1.9x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 200-28mm
Scores 88 overall, wins 4 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 22 specs.
