Sigma 28-200mm f/3.5-5.6 DG IF Macro Aspherical

Sigma 28-200mm f/3.5-5.6 DG IF Macro Aspherical

Sigma
62 Overall Score
vs
Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Sony
90 Overall Score

Scores

Budget
Sigma
61
Sony
100
Street
Sigma
62
Sony
89
Travel
Sigma
51
Sony
85
Macro
Sigma
85
Sony
69
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
47
Sony
84
Portrait
Sigma
65
Sony
83
Video Cinema
Sigma
52
Sony
83
Professional
Sigma
53
Sony
73
Landscape
Sigma
51
Sony
73

Specifications

Sigma 28-200mm f/3.5-5.6 DG IF Macro AsphericalSony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS
Optics
Typemacrozoom
Focal Length Min28 mm18 mm
Focal Length Max200 mm135 mm
Elements1616
Groups1412
Aspherical Elements—1★
ED Elements—2★
CoatingMulti-layer lens coating—
Aperture
Max Aperturef/3.5f/3.5
Min Aperture3.5-5.63.5-5.6
Constant✗✗
Diaphragm Blades—7★
Build
MountCanon EFSony E
Formatfull-frame★APS-C
Weight0.40 kg0.33 kg★
Filter Thread—55 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF Type—Linear motor★
Stabilization—✓★
Focus
Min Focus Distance35 mm★450 mm
Max Magnification1:3.8★0.29x

Pros & Cons

Sigma 28-200mm f/3.5-5.6 DG IF Macro Aspherical

  • Strong macro (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong versatility (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong aperture (77th percentile)
  • Strong optical (76th percentile)

Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

  • Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong versatility (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (82nd percentile)82nd %ile

Pricing

Sigma 28-200mm f/3.5-5.6 DG IF Macro Aspherical

No current pricing available

Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Verdict

★ Winner: Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS

Scores 90 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 20 specs.

Sigma 28-200mm f/3.5-5.6 DG IF Macro Aspherical Better at:

Macro

Sony E 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS Better at:

BudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider