Sigma 207975

Sigma 207975

Sigma
85 Overall Score
vs
Nikon NIKKOR 35mm f/1.8 S 35mm

Nikon NIKKOR 35mm f/1.8 S 35mm

Nikon
60 Overall Score

Scores

Professional
Sigma
86
Nikon
50
Street
Sigma
86
Nikon
55
Macro
Sigma
82
Nikon
59
Portrait
Sigma
81
Nikon
36
Travel
Sigma
80
Nikon
61
Budget
Sigma
75
Nikon
55
Video Cinema
Sigma
74
Nikon
40
Landscape
Sigma
71
Nikon
60
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
66
Nikon
50

Specifications

Sigma 207975Nikon NIKKOR 35mm f/1.8 S 35mm
Optics
Typewide-angle-zoomprime
Focal Length Min10 mm35 mm
Focal Length Max18 mm35 mm
Elements138
Groups106
Aspherical Elements11
ED Elements42
CoatingSuper Multi-Layer CoatingSuper Integrated Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/22
Min Aperturef/2.8f/1.8
Constant
Diaphragm Blades77
Build
MountSony ENikon F
FormatAPS-CAPS-C
Weather Sealed
Weight0.26 kg0.20 kg
Filter Thread67 mm52 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAutofocusSilent Wave Motor
Stabilization
Stabilization Stops5 stops
Focus
Min Focus Distance117 mm300 mm
Max Magnification1:41:6.25

Pros & Cons

Sigma 207975

  • Strong macro (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong build (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong aperture (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong optical (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Below average social proof (29th percentile)

Nikon NIKKOR 35mm f/1.8 S 35mm

  • Strong build (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong social proof (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong macro (71st percentile)
  • Below average bokeh (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average aperture (21st percentile)
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)

Pricing

Nikon NIKKOR 35mm f/1.8 S 35mm is CA$682 cheaper (3.8x less).

Sigma 2079750.093score per dollar
vs
Nikon NIKKOR 35mm f/1.8 S 35mm0.250score per dollar

Nikon NIKKOR 35mm f/1.8 S 35mm offers 2.7x better value for money

Verdict

Winner: Sigma 207975

Scores 85 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 3 of 22 specs.

Sigma 207975 Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider