Sigma 207975

Sigma 207975

Sigma
85 Overall Score
vs
Canon RF16-28mm F2.8 IS STM 16-28mm

Canon RF16-28mm F2.8 IS STM 16-28mm

Canon
77 Overall Score

Scores

Landscape
Sigma
71
Canon
90
Professional
Sigma
86
Canon
83
Street
Sigma
86
Canon
67
Video Cinema
Sigma
74
Canon
82
Macro
Sigma
82
Canon
82
Portrait
Sigma
81
Canon
52
Travel
Sigma
80
Canon
77
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
66
Canon
78
Budget
Sigma
75
Canon
72

Specifications

Sigma 207975Canon RF16-28mm F2.8 IS STM 16-28mm
Optics
Typewide-angle-zoomzoom
Focal Length Min10 mm16 mm
Focal Length Max18 mm28 mm
Elements1316
Groups1013
Aspherical Elements12
ED Elements44
CoatingSuper Multi-Layer CoatingSuper Spectra Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/22
Min Aperturef/2.8f/2.8
Constant
Diaphragm Blades79
Build
MountSony ECanon RF
FormatAPS-Cfull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight0.26 kg0.45 kg
Filter Thread67 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAutofocusSTM
Stabilization
Stabilization Stops5.5 stops
Focus
Min Focus Distance117 mm250 mm
Max Magnification1:41:3.85

Pros & Cons

Sigma 207975

  • Strong macro (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong build (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong aperture (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong optical (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Below average social proof (29th percentile)

Canon RF16-28mm F2.8 IS STM 16-28mm

  • Strong stabilization (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong optical (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong macro (78th percentile)
  • Below average aperture (21st percentile)
  • Below average bokeh (24th percentile)

Pricing

Sigma 207975 is CA$777 cheaper (1.8x less).

Sigma 2079750.093score per dollar
vs
Canon RF16-28mm F2.8 IS STM 16-28mm0.045score per dollar

Sigma 207975 offers 2.1x better value for money

Canon RF16-28mm F2.8 IS STM 16-28mm

Verdict

Winner: Sigma 207975

Scores 85 overall, wins 5 of 9 usage categories and 2 of 22 specs.

Sigma 207975 Better at:

BudgetStreetTravelPortraitProfessional

Canon RF16-28mm F2.8 IS STM 16-28mm Better at:

LandscapeVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider