Sigma 207975

Sigma 207975

Sigma
85 Overall Score
vs
Canon RF 28-70mm f/2L USM 70-28mm

Canon RF 28-70mm f/2L USM 70-28mm

Canon
60 Overall Score

Scores

Professional
Sigma
86
Canon
65
Street
Sigma
86
Canon
55
Macro
Sigma
82
Canon
50
Portrait
Sigma
81
Canon
48
Travel
Sigma
80
Canon
57
Budget
Sigma
75
Canon
70
Video Cinema
Sigma
74
Canon
57
Landscape
Sigma
71
Canon
73
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
66
Canon
61

Specifications

Sigma 207975Canon RF 28-70mm f/2L USM 70-28mm
Optics
Typewide-angle-zoomzoom
Focal Length Min10 mm28 mm
Focal Length Max18 mm70 mm
Elements1319
Groups1013
Aspherical Elements11
ED Elements43
CoatingSuper Multi-Layer Coatingfluorine coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/22
Min Aperturef/2.8f/2
Constant
Diaphragm Blades79
Build
MountSony ECanon RF
FormatAPS-Cfull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight0.26 kg1.43 kg
Filter Thread67 mm95 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAutofocusUSM
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance117 mm390 mm
Max Magnification1:40.18x

Pros & Cons

Sigma 207975

  • Strong macro (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong build (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong aperture (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong optical (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Below average social proof (29th percentile)

Canon RF 28-70mm f/2L USM 70-28mm

  • Strong social proof (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong af (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong optical (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong versatility (77th percentile)
  • Below average aperture (21st percentile)
  • Below average build (21st percentile)
  • Below average bokeh (24th percentile)

Pricing

Sigma 207975 is CA$3,068 cheaper (4.3x less).

Sigma 2079750.093score per dollar
vs
Canon RF 28-70mm f/2L USM 70-28mm0.015score per dollar

Sigma 207975 offers 6.2x better value for money

Canon RF 28-70mm f/2L USM 70-28mm

Verdict

Winner: Sigma 207975

Scores 85 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 4 of 21 specs.

Sigma 207975 Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider