Samyang AF 135mm f/1.8 FE 135mm

Samyang AF 135mm f/1.8 FE 135mm

Samyang
48 Overall Score
vs
Sigma 207975

Sigma 207975

Sigma
85 Overall Score

Scores

Professional
Samyang
63
Sigma
86
Street
Samyang
51
Sigma
86
Macro
Samyang
54
Sigma
82
Portrait
Samyang
46
Sigma
81
Travel
Samyang
43
Sigma
80
Budget
Samyang
51
Sigma
75
Video Cinema
Samyang
52
Sigma
74
Landscape
Samyang
51
Sigma
71
Wildlife Sports
Samyang
56
Sigma
66

Specifications

Samyang AF 135mm f/1.8 FE 135mmSigma 207975
Optics
Typeprimewide-angle-zoom
Focal Length Min135 mm10 mm
Focal Length Max135 mm18 mm
Elements1313
Groups1110
Aspherical Elements11
ED Elements34
CoatingUltra multicoatingSuper Multi-Layer Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/22f/2.8
Min Aperturef/1.8f/2.8
Constant
Diaphragm Blades117
Build
MountSony ESony E
Formatfull-frameAPS-C
Weather Sealed
Weight0.77 kg0.26 kg
Filter Thread82 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeLinear STM AF MotorAutofocus
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance690 mm117 mm
Max Magnification1:4.21:4

Pros & Cons

Samyang AF 135mm f/1.8 FE 135mm

  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong optical (81st percentile)81st %ile
  • Below average aperture (21st percentile)
  • Below average user sentiment (22nd percentile)
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)
  • Below average bokeh (35th percentile)

Sigma 207975

  • Strong macro (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong build (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong aperture (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong optical (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Below average social proof (29th percentile)

Pricing

Both products are similarly priced.

Samyang AF 135mm f/1.8 FE 135mm0.058score per dollar
vs
Sigma 2079750.093score per dollar

Sigma 207975 offers 1.6x better value for money

Samyang AF 135mm f/1.8 FE 135mm

Verdict

Winner: Sigma 207975

Scores 85 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 3 of 21 specs.

Sigma 207975 Better at:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Also Consider